The receipts behind the math.

Delta Prime is built on one hard commitment: the AI never does the math. A deterministic calculation engine does — and the fair question is whether that engine is actually right. This page is the answer, in the engine's own terms.

We validate it the way you'd audit a calculator: run the same case through a free, authoritative outside reference and compare the numbers. Every check below runs automatically on every build, against answers frozen in our test suite, so the agreement can't quietly drift. Where a check is weaker, or doesn't exist, we say so.

How we check it

1

A deterministic engine does the arithmetic.

Every number in your plan comes from ordinary rules-based software that follows fixed formulas and published tax rules — the same kind of code that runs tax-prep and actuarial systems. Same inputs, same answer, every time. The AI only interprets your question and explains the result; it never computes.

2

We check it against outside references.

For each part of the engine we run the same case through a free, authoritative outside reference — an independent calculator, or the government's own published tables — and compare. This is differential testing: agreement with a source we don't control, not just agreement with ourselves.

3

The checks run on every build.

Most reference answers are frozen into our test suite, and the engine is re-run against them automatically, every time we ship — hundreds of cases, continuously, so those numbers can't drift out of agreement without a test turning red first. A few, like the Monte-Carlo success rate, are checked as plausibility bands against a published study rather than a frozen figure; we flag which below.

A financial planner might sanity-check a handful of numbers once. These checks run hundreds of cases across every part of the engine, on every build, and never expire quietly.

The receipts

Each row is a part of your plan, the outside reference we check it against, and how close the engine lands. “To the cent” means the largest difference we observe across the test battery is under one cent.

Part of your planChecked againstHow close
Federal income tax — brackets, capital gains, the 3.8% net investment income tax, the taxation of Social Security, and the standard-vs-itemized choice.NBER TAXSIM — an independent academic tax model used in hundreds of published studiesTo the cent for the households the TAXSIM fixtures exercise — including itemizing cases, via the §63(e) standard-vs-itemized election. The per-line itemized deduction caps are computed to the statute, not TAXSIM-checked.
Social Security — the reduction for claiming early, the delayed-retirement credit, and spousal and survivor benefitsThe Social Security Administration's own published benefit-adjustment tables (Pub. 05-10147)Within 0.1 point
Required Minimum Distributions from retirement accountsThe IRS Uniform Lifetime Table (Publication 590-B)Divisors match exactly
Medicare IRMAA premium surchargesThe published CMS 2026 income tiers and surcharge amountsThresholds & surcharges match exactly
ACA marketplace subsidies — the required-contribution percentages and the 400%-of-poverty cliffIRS Rev. Proc. 2025-25 and the 2025 HHS poverty guidelinesMatch exactly
Alternative Minimum TaxIRS Form 6251, worked line by lineTo the cent
Self-employment tax, the QBI deduction, and solo-401(k)/SEP contributionsSchedule SE, Form 8995, and IRS Publication 560, worked by handTo the cent
Rental real estate — depreciation, §1250 recapture, and passive-loss limits2026 tax law, worked by handTo the cent
Founder / early-employee stock — the §1202 (QSBS) exclusionThe 2026 statute, worked by handTo the cent
Federal student-loan repayment — income-driven, RAP, ICR, and standard plansFederal repayment rules (34 CFR §685.209, P.L. 119-21)To the cent
Estate & trust planning factors — GRAT / CRAT annuity and remainder values (§7520)IRS Publication 1457, Table BTo four decimal places
Longevity — the life-expectancy table behind survival projectionsThe SSA Period Life Table's published life expectancy at 65Within 0.05 year
Retirement success rates — the Monte Carlo simulationThe published Trinity / Bengen safe-withdrawal studies, over 1928–2025 market historyOur Monte Carlo puts the classic 4%/30-yr success rate at 93.1%, about 2 points below the published Trinity ~95%

The federal income-tax check (highlighted) is the flagship: more than 200 sample households spanning every tax bracket, the capital-gains rate zones, the net investment income tax, and the taxation of Social Security, all reproduced to the cent against an independent calculator we don't control. It also caught a real bug — Social Security taxation that omitted realized capital gains — which the comparison surfaced and we fixed.

What this does and doesn't cover

Trust copy is only worth anything if it's honest about the edges. Here is where the checks are strong, and where they stop.

  • State income tax is an approximation — and it is not oracle-validated.
    The federal check above is the rigorous one. State income tax is modeled as an estimate — a few states use their real brackets and standard deductions, and the rest use a flat top-marginal rate — but none of it is checked against an independent tax calculator the way the federal numbers are. Treat the state portion as a reasonable estimate, not a validated figure.
  • The strongest check is federal tax; the rest are checked against official tables or worked by hand.
    Only federal income tax runs through a fully independent calculator (TAXSIM). The others are validated against the official published figures from the IRS, SSA, CMS, and HHS — and where no public calculator exists, we work the IRS form or statute by hand and have a second reviewer re-derive it. That's genuine external ground truth, but it isn't all the same kind of check, and we'd rather say so.
  • The tax mechanics are validated at 2023; the current-year dollar amounts are checked separately.
    The public TAXSIM deployment computes federal tax through 2023, so that's the year we run the head-to-head comparison. The engine's formulas don't change year to year — only the dollar thresholds do — so 2023 validates the mechanics, and the current-year brackets and constants are checked separately against the published IRS figures. Tax constants track current law and are updated as the law changes.
  • Head of household is checked to the cent for federal income tax — but the Child Tax Credit and AMT sit outside that check.
    Head of household is a supported filing status, and its federal income tax is validated the same way the others are: the head-of-household ordinary brackets (§1(j)(2)(B), which fall between single and married-filing-jointly), the standard deduction (§63(c)(2)(B)), the long-term capital-gains and qualified-dividend rate zones (which have their own head-of-household breakpoints), the 3.8% net investment income tax threshold, and the taxation of Social Security all reproduce an independent calculator (TAXSIM) to the cent across 46 sample households. Two pieces sit outside that check: the §24 Child Tax Credit isn’t modeled, so what’s validated is the tax before any credit, not the credit itself; and the alternative minimum tax is validated separately against IRS Form 6251, not in this comparison. Eligibility itself — that you’re unmarried, pay more than half the cost of your home, and have a qualifying person living with you (§2(b)) — is taken as told, not checked, exactly as the marriage behind a joint or separate return is taken as told.
  • When the first spouse dies, the deceased spouse's share of taxable assets is stepped up — with several pieces still to come.
    At the first death in a couple, the cost basis of the deceased spouse's share of taxable investments — and of rental, business, and other schedule assets — is reset to market value on the date of death, so the surviving spouse owes less capital-gains and depreciation-recapture tax on those assets when they're sold between the two deaths (IRC §1014). In common-law states only the decedent's half steps up; in a community-property state the whole asset can, but we apply that fuller step-up only when you tell us the asset is held as community property — we never infer it from your state of residence. Traditional IRA, 401(k), and HSA balances do not step up. Still to come: when longevity is left to vary randomly, a first death before retirement isn't modeled yet (both partners are assumed to reach retirement; you can set an explicit first-death year yourself); a few asset types — equity compensation and partnership interests — aren't split at a death yet; and bypass / credit-shelter (A/B) trust planning is deferred, so we assume the simpler portability default.
  • Projections are modeling, not guarantees.
    Monte Carlo results are drawn from historical market data using standard actuarial and statistical methods. They describe a range of possible outcomes; they are not a forecast, and nothing here promises any particular investment return. Past market history does not guarantee future results.
  • Longevity uses a healthier-than-average default, which you can change.
    By default we use an annuitant mortality table, which assumes a longer-than-average life and so is slightly optimistic about how long a portfolio has to last. A general-population SSA table is one setting away for a more conservative view — and it, too, is validated against SSA's published life expectancy.
  • This validates arithmetic, not your decisions.
    These checks prove the engine computes the tax and planning math correctly. They are not a substitute for filing your taxes, and Delta Prime is not a registered investment adviser. When a question needs a licensed professional — a CFP, CPA, or attorney — we tell you plainly and point you there.

For the full, itemized list of the domains, states, and tax rules the engine models — and where each is exact versus approximated — search the coverage tool on How It Works.

Where the engine estimates

The receipts above are what we validate. This is the other side of the ledger: the deliberate approximations the engine makes — where a number is a considered estimate rather than an exact calculation — and which way each one can lean. These render straight from the engine's own registry, so the list here is the engine's, not a marketing summary of it.

These are the KNOWN, REGISTERED approximations only - a growing FLOOR, NOT an exhaustive census. An approximation the engine makes but no one has registered stays invisible here; do NOT read this as 'these are all the approximations the engine makes.' Each row records the SIGN of an error (rosy / conservative / exact / indeterminate), never its magnitude.

Showing 92 of 92 registered approximations

Leans optimistic25

  • Leans optimisticAla. Admin. Code r.810-3-15.20 / 2025 Form 40 Line 12 'Federal Income Tax Deduction Worksheet' (booklet p.30): the deduction = max(0, 1040 line 22 + §1411 NIIT − [EIC + additional CTC + refundable AOC + refundable adoption + Form 2439])

    Alabama lets a household deduct its federal income tax. We size that deduction from your federal tax before a few credits (education, Earned Income, additional Child Tax Credit) that the state's worksheet subtracts. For most retirees those are zero; for a lower-income or working household with children the deduction can be slightly too large, understating Alabama tax a little.

    Not independently checkedOn our roadmap to refine
  • Leans optimisticIRC §530(b)(1)(E) / §530(d)(8) (a Coverdell balance must be distributed within 30 days after the beneficiary attains age 30, special-needs excepted) + §530(d)(4) (the 10% additional tax on the deemed distribution's earnings)

    A Coverdell balance that isn't used up must be paid out once the child turns 30, with the earnings taxed plus a 10% penalty. We don't yet model that age-30 payout, so a Coverdell you never draw on keeps growing tax-free past 30 in your plan — making it look slightly better than the law allows. Most Coverdells are spent on college well before 30, so this only matters for a balance left unused.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Leans optimisticIRC §72(t) 10% additional tax on early distributions

    The 10% penalty on pre-59.5 retirement withdrawals is applied to the money you draw to spend and to the amounts drawn to pay that year's federal and state tax. Only a small residual from the one-pass tax-on-tax estimate is left out, so the penalty (and cost) can be very slightly understated.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Leans optimisticIRC §1222 (>1yr long-term capital gain) + §422(a)(1) (ISO: >2yr from grant / >1yr from exercise)

    When you don't give us the acquisition and sale dates, long-term and other holding-period tests for equity compensation are measured in whole calendar years, so a holding just under a year that crosses New Year's can be treated as long-term and taxed at the lower rate. Give us the acquisition and sale dates to classify the holding to the day.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Leans optimisticIRC §2010(c)(4) DSUE portability + §2010(c)(5)(A) timely-Form-706 election

    For a married couple we assume the first spouse's unused estate-tax exemption carries over to the survivor (the portability election). If that election isn't actually filed the real shield is smaller, so estate tax can be understated. Binds only on estates above one exemption (about $15M).

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Leans optimisticIRC §2501 (gift tax) + IRC §1001/§1(h) (the donor realizes LTCG when selling appreciated property to raise cash) — the gift TAX is a real sale, NOT the §1015 no-recognition gift itself

    Once your lifetime gifts use up your remaining gift-and-estate tax exemption, the gift tax owed on the excess is paid by selling from your taxable investments. We don't add the capital-gains tax on that sale, so your projected wealth in those years can run slightly high.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Leans optimisticIRC §1(h) LTCG rate zones + §1411 NIIT

    A fallback path taxes a capital gain at a flat 15% instead of the full 0/15/20% brackets plus the 3.8% investment tax. In real plans the full bracket path runs instead; this flat leg only appears in isolated internal calculations.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Leans optimisticIRC §223(f)(2) non-qualified HSA distributions as ordinary income + §223(f)(4) 20% additional tax before age 65

    When HSA funds are treated as non-qualified, we apply the income tax and 20% penalty both to the amount you draw to spend and to the HSA dollars pulled to pay your federal and state tax bill. A small residual (HSA dollars covering the one-pass tax-on-tax estimate's own draw or a one-off outflow, a rare deep-deficit path) can still escape, so tax can be very slightly understated.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Leans optimisticIRC §2035(a) 3-year lookback on a life-insurance policy transferred to an ILIT (vs §2042 exclusion for an ILIT-owned newly-issued policy); §101(a) income-tax-freedom is exact

    A life-insurance-trust benefit is modeled as fully outside the taxable estate, assuming a newly issued policy. If an existing policy was moved into the trust within three years of death, the law pulls it back into the estate, so estate tax can be understated in that case.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Leans optimisticIRC §61 / §62(a) (a realized business-exit / rental capital gain is in gross income and in AGI); the lane_income_coupling gate

    Maryland's 2% surtax on large capital gains applies once your federal income clears $350,000. When a business-sale or rental gain is the main thing that would carry you over that $350,000 line, we don't always count it toward that test — even though it still counts toward the gains the surtax is measured on — so in that case the surtax can be missed and your tax understated.

    Not independently checkedOn our roadmap to refine
  • Leans optimisticIRC §66 / Pub 555 community-property per-return split (Form 8958); out-of-state muni interest rides the POOLED state base but is NOT added to the A-STATE per-return legs (

    For a married couple filing separately in a community-property state, the state tax on out-of-state municipal-bond interest can be left out of the separate-return calculation, which understates the tax and overstates your wealth. This affects only that narrow filing situation.

    Not independently checkedOn our roadmap to refine
  • Leans optimisticIRC §1(h) LTCG rate zones — a post-retirement equity CAPITAL event zoned on a zero-wage base, omitting concurrent taxable retirement-account withdrawals

    A post-retirement stock-compensation sale is now taxed correctly against your concurrent retirement withdrawals when stock compensation is your only such income. In two cases the capital-gain rate can still be set too low (undertaxed): when you also have rental, self-employment, or business income that year, or when you file married-separately.

    Not independently checkedOn our roadmap to refine
  • Leans optimisticIRC §1411 NIIT (once-per-return lesser-of) + §1(h) LTCG rate-zone joint stacking

    For a home sale (or a jointly-owned inherited-asset sale) we now apply the 3.8% investment tax when it is your household's only investment income. Two gaps remain: when another investment already carries that tax, this sale's gain isn't added to it, and each gain is bracketed on its own rather than stacked with a year's other sales, so a multi-sale year can be undertaxed.

    Not independently checkedOn our roadmap to refine
  • Leans optimisticIRC §469(i)(6) active-participation requirement (plus >=10% ownership) for the $25,000 special allowance, assumed satisfied by default

    When you don't say otherwise, we assume you actively participate in your rental — the typical case for a direct owner — which grants the up-to-$25,000 special allowance to offset other income. A purely passive investor (a limited partner, or under 10% ownership) gets none, so this can understate tax in that case. Telling us your participation removes the assumption.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Leans optimisticIRC §469(c)(7)(A) — a qualifying real-estate professional may ELECT to treat all interests in rental real estate as one activity

    A real-estate professional can elect to treat all rentals as one activity, and we assume you make that election. If you don't, each rental is tested on its own: one you don't run actively enough is passive, so its loss is deferred instead of used now and its income stays in the 3.8% investment tax — so this can make your plan look slightly better until you tell us you didn't elect.

    Not independently checkedOn our roadmap to refine
  • Leans optimisticIRC §408A(d)(1) non-qualified Roth earnings as ordinary income + §72(t)/§408A(d)(3)(F) 10% additional tax

    Roth earnings drawn before 59.5 to pay federal and state tax are now taxed and penalized; only a small residual from the one-pass tax-on-tax estimate can still escape in a deep-deficit year (once every other account is exhausted), so tax can be very slightly understated in that rare case.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Leans optimisticIRC §121(a) two-of-five-year use & ownership test + §121(b)(3) one-sale-per-two-years limitation

    When you sell your primary home, the exclusion ($250k single / $500k married) applies only if you qualify — a home bought during your plan and sold within two years no longer gets it. We still assume a home owned before your plan met the two-of-five-year ownership/use test, and that you had no earlier qualifying sale unless you tell us, so a recently bought or rented home could be understated.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Leans optimisticIRC §911 foreign-earned-income exclusion as a §36B(d)(2)(B) ACA-MAGI / §86(b)(2)(B) Social-Security-provisional-income / 42 U.S.C. §1395r(i)(4) IRMAA-MAGI add-back; the engine models no foreign-earned-income field, so the statutory add-back into the three retirement MAGI bases is silently absent

    If you have foreign earned income that US law lets an expatriate exclude, it still counts toward the income figure behind health-insurance subsidies, Social Security taxation and Medicare high-income surcharges. We do not model foreign earned income yet, so for such a household that figure is understated — overstating the subsidy and understating those taxes and your wealth.

    Not independently checkedOn our roadmap to refine
  • Leans optimisticState bracket/deduction/surtax figures with no statutory COLA held real-constant

    For the few state tax figures a state's own law leaves frozen (not inflation-indexed), we hold them steady in real terms rather than letting them erode. That credits slightly wider brackets or deductions than reality, so state tax can be understated over time.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Leans optimistic36 M.R.S. §5124-C(2) AGI phase-out window ($75,000 single/MFS, $112,500 HoH, $150,000 MFJ/QSS) — a fixed nominal divisor absent from the §5403 COLA list, while §5403 indexes the §5124-C(1-B) standard-deduction amount + its start threshold; held real-constant in

    In Maine, the standard deduction phases out as income rises, over a fixed dollar income range that Maine does not inflation-adjust (only the deduction amount is adjusted). Held steady in today's dollars, that range lets a later-year Maine household in the phase-out band keep slightly more deduction than the law allows -- a small understatement of Maine tax that grows over a long horizon.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Leans optimistic34 CFR §685.209(b) ICR / FR 2025-14806 Attachment 1 (2-column factor schedule, no MFS column)

    The income-contingent student-loan repayment schedule has only single and married columns, so a married-filing-separately borrower is calibrated on the single column, which produces a slightly lower payment.

    Direction checked against an outside referenceInherent modeling limit
  • Leans optimisticIRC §661/§662 (the beneficiary includes the distributed DNI in income)

    For a trust you fund before retirement that pays income out to you, our detailed year-by-year (deterministic) view doesn't yet apply your tax on those payouts during your working years — so on that view your wealth can look somewhat high. Your main projection, the one your plan is scored on, taxes those payouts correctly in every phase.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Leans optimisticIRC §641 (income taxation of estates and trusts) + §1(e) compressed trust brackets + §1(h) trust LTCG rate-zone + §1411 trust NIIT + §1211(b)/§1212(b)

    For a trust you fund during your lifetime, we compute its yearly income tax and carry a down-year investment loss forward to offset a later gain. One simplification: we treat the trust's earnings as dividends and long-term gains, not as interest or other ordinary income, so if it holds bonds or similar its tax can be slightly understated.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Leans optimisticState death tax on an upstream decedent's estate omitted when the decedent's state is a not-yet-modeled inheritance-tax state or is left unstated — federal §2001 and the modeled state estate taxes are applied and the decedent's state is now an elicited input

    When you inherit from a parent's estate, we apply federal estate tax on it before the inheritance reaches you, plus the parent's state estate tax once you tell us the state they lived in. We still leave off state death tax for a few states whose inheritance tax we don't yet model, or when the parent's state hasn't been given, so the inheritance can be overstated in those cases.

    Not independently checkedOn our roadmap to refine
  • Leans optimisticState wages are SOURCE-sourced — taxed where the work is performed — with the residence state taxing worldwide wages and crediting tax paid to the work state (so the commuter's net ≈ the higher of the two rates); the engine sources the accumulation wage state tax to the per-year RESIDENCE via

    Your working-years state income tax follows the state you live in each year, which is exact when your work moves with you or you work remotely. If you instead commute to a job in a different state than where you live, and that state's income tax is higher than your home state's, your state tax can be understated until you can tell us where you work.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit

Could go either way37

  • Could go either wayIRC §36B premium tax credit — benchmark SLCSP premium (Rev. Proc. 2025-25 applicable-% table; 42 U.S.C. §18071 FPL prior-year rule)

    You enter one annual health-insurance premium as this year's cost, and we now age it up the Federal age-rating curve as your household gets older, so a pre-65 bridge gets more expensive over time. We still use that entry as the benchmark that sizes your ACA subsidy, and real premiums also vary by county and plan tier, so it can run high or low for your area and plan.

    Not independently checkedOn our roadmap to refine
  • Could go either wayFlat M&A selling-cost fraction vs itemized transaction costs

    We estimate the banker, legal and escrow costs of selling a business as a flat percentage of the sale price, which can be above or below your actual transaction costs.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Could go either wayIRC §1411(c)(4) NII on a pass-through interest sale

    Whether a business-sale gain counts as net investment income is decided from a single materially-participated flag rather than the full active-versus-passive asset test, which can push the 3.8% investment tax too high or too low.

    Not independently checkedOn our roadmap to refine
  • Could go either wayIRC §66 community property + §469 / §86 per-return residuals under MFS

    In the nine community-property states, married-filing-separately returns keep passive-loss and Social-Security-taxation figures pooled at the household level rather than split per return, which can run either way depending on your situation.

    Not independently checkedOn our roadmap to refine
  • Could go either wayIRC §72(t) 10% early-distribution penalty is per-IRA-owner; the engine gates the POOLED-traditional penalty on the primary's age only

    For a jointly-filing couple whose accounts are not individually labeled, the 10% early-withdrawal penalty is gated on the primary spouse's age only, while the retirement pool it applies to is shared, so a couple with one spouse over 59.5 and one under can be penalized a bit too much or too little. A separately-filing couple with labeled accounts is penalized per spouse.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Could go either wayIRC §529(c)(3)(A) earnings/basis allocation (§72(e) ratio) + §529(c)(6) 10% additional tax on non-qualified earnings

    When you don't tell us how much of a 529 balance is your original contributions, we assume the whole balance is contributions. A seasoned account usually holds embedded gains, so the tax on a non-qualified withdrawal can be understated. Telling us the contributed amount removes this.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Could go either wayIRC §529 contribution state income-tax deduction/credit (~30 states + DC, capped; e.g. N.Y. Tax Law §612(c)(32), 35 ILCS 5/203, Va. Code §58.1-322.03(7), Ind. Code §6-3-3-12)

    We treat a 529 contribution as pure cash out, with no state income-tax deduction or credit. About 30 states plus DC offer one, so for a contributing resident of those states we may slightly overstate state tax.

    Not independently checkedOn our roadmap to refine
  • Could go either wayIRC §1015 (a lifetime gift takes the donor's CARRYOVER basis — NO §1014 step-up, unlike assets held to death) + §1(h) (the donee's preferential 0/15/20% LTCG on the built-in gain) + §1411 (donee NIIT, OMITTED)

    Lifetime gifts to family heirs leave your taxable estate but stay in the family, so we add them back into your projected inheritance, grown at the same return your own investments earn. We credit them at full value without modeling the heirs' own capital-gains tax on the gifted assets or a return that differs from yours, so the inheritance shown for the gift can run either high or low.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Could go either wayHealthcare cost of a married-filing-separately household (ACA out-of-pocket coverage-count #1 + UNARMED secondary Medicare #5)

    For a married-filing-separately household we count one Medicare enrollee unless the plan splits ownership between spouses, which can understate a 65+ second spouse's cost. The separate-filer ACA household-size default (1) now scales an out-of-pocket estimate whose right coverage-count is an open question, so it can run high or low. The separate ACA subsidy denial is handled correctly.

    Not independently checkedOn our roadmap to refine
  • Could go either wayRetiree healthcare OOP cost-sharing (Part A/B deductibles + coinsurance up to the OOP-max, Part C cost-sharing), the Medigap/Part C supplement premium, Part D drug cost-sharing, and uncovered dental/vision/hearing — modeled from cited CMS/KFF/Milliman averages (42 CFR §409.61/§422.100, SSA Act §1833/§1860D-2(b)(4)(B), 45 CFR §156.130, KFF Medigap/MCBS)

    We now model retirement health costs beyond premiums — deductibles and coinsurance up to the out-of-pocket max, Medicare Advantage cost-sharing, a Medigap/supplement premium, drug out-of-pocket, and dental/vision/hearing — using national averages and a default Medicare Advantage coverage choice. Your real cost can be higher or lower; you can enter your own figures to replace the averages.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Could go either wayIRC §691(a)

    When the beneficiaries you've named don't add up to your whole estate, the leftover share is taxed at a single assumed heir tax rate, because the remaining heirs' own incomes aren't known. That assumed rate can be higher or lower than their real rate, so the tax on this leftover portion can run either way.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Could go either wayHome-sale transaction costs (agent commission + closing) modeled as a flat fraction of gross price, not itemized state/market/price-dependent costs

    We model the cost of selling a home as a flat ~8% of the price (commission plus closing), not the itemized, market- and state-specific costs, so net proceeds can be a little high or low. This stays an approximation even if you override the percentage.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Could go either wayAuto-created HYSA holding-account real return

    A completed emergency-savings goal is parked in a holding account earning a 0% real return. When true savings rates beat inflation this understates growth; when they trail inflation it overstates it.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Could go either wayMSCI EAFE real-return series begins 1970; pre-1970 international generated as EAFE = alpha + beta*US + eps (OLS-fit on the 1970-2025 overlap, residual bootstrap)

    International stocks have no data before 1970, so for earlier simulated years they are estimated from US stocks of the same year plus a market-specific wobble. From 1970 on, actual paired international returns are used, so US and international move together realistically. Only the estimated pre-1970 stretch can make the outcome range slightly wider or narrower.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Could go either way42 U.S.C. §1395r(i)(4) / §1839(i)(4)(B)(i) Medicare IRMAA 2-year MAGI lookback (POMS HI 01101.031)

    Medicare's high-income surcharge is legally based on your income from two years earlier, and we apply that lag. For the first year or two of a plan where you reach Medicare right away, that earlier year predates your plan: tell us your income from then and we use it, otherwise we fall back to current-year income for those years, which can run the surcharge a little high or low.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Could go either wayIRC §61(a)(5) rents as ordinary income; omitted §1411 NIIT / §469 passive-loss / §199A QBI / §167-168 depreciation

    Rent from a jointly inherited property is taxed at your ordinary and flat state rates only, with no depreciation or business-income deduction (which tends to overstate tax) but also skipping the 3.8% investment tax (which understates it). The net depends on your income.

    Not independently checkedOn our roadmap to refine
  • Could go either wayInc-2 lane_income_coupling (always-on): a rental / SE / business producer's post-retirement ordinary income is taxed at a marginal rate stacked above _retirement_ordinary_income_schedule (a DETERMINISTIC post-ret portfolio proxy, max(0, living_expenses − 0.15·SS_gross)), not the actual per-path drawdown ordinary income

    After retirement, the tax rate on your rental, self-employment, or business income is set using a smooth estimate of your portfolio withdrawals that year rather than the exact amount, so its rate can be slightly too low in a year you draw more than estimated (undertaxed) or slightly too high in a year you draw less. The estimate keeps the dashboard and the range-of-outcomes projection consistent.

    Not independently checkedOn our roadmap to refine
  • Could go either wayIRC §1211(b) $3,000 ordinary-loss offset tax benefit valued at a flat household marginal rate, not the progressive bracket delta

    The tax saving from the $3,000 capital-loss deduction is valued at a single flat marginal rate rather than the exact bracket effect in the year it's used, which can overstate or understate the saving. The $3,000 cap itself is inflation-adjusted correctly.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Could go either wayGenworth Cost of Care state medians substituted for MSA/metro granularity (the MSA table is abandoned)

    Long-term-care costs use your state's median as the finest detail, which overstates lower-cost rural areas and understates expensive metros within a state.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Could go either wayLTC episode duration modeled uniform / age-blind vs a competing-mortality-shortened duration at older onset

    The AGE at which long-term care begins is modeled with an age-rising hazard (care concentrated in late life), but each episode's LENGTH is drawn from a fixed range regardless of onset age. Since real episodes tend to be shorter when care starts very late, this can overstate the most-common late-life episodes and understate early-onset ones. Your lifetime chance of needing care is held fixed.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Could go either wayMo. Rev. Stat. §143.171.2 + MO-1040 2025 booklet worksheet Lines 9-13: the modeled §143.171 deduction = min(cap[$5k/$10k], phase(MO AGI) x [1040 line 22 - refundable credits + Sch 2 Part II other taxes])

    Missouri lets a household deduct part of its federal income tax -- capped ($5,000, or $10,000 jointly) and phased to zero above $125,000 of Missouri income. We model this, including how Missouri's capital-gains exclusion can lift you into a more generous tier. A few smaller worksheet details stay approximated, but the whole effect is small -- at most about $235/$470 a year.

    Not independently checkedOn our roadmap to refine
  • Could go either wayDept. of Revenue of Ky. v. Davis, 553 U.S. 328 (2008); (2) re-resolves each residency leg's STATE-taxable muni AMOUNT against its OWN state via

    If you move between states and haven't told us which state issued each of your municipal bonds, the taxable share is estimated from one in-state percentage for both the before- and after-move periods, rather than re-figured from each bond's issuing state — right for the state you left but possibly wrong for the one you moved to. Telling us the breakdown by issuing state makes it exact.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Could go either wayReal-property capital gains are sourced to the property's situs (taxed where the property sits), not the owner's residence

    The tax on selling a property is applied at your home state's capital-gains rate unless you tell us which state the property is in. For a property in your own state that is exact; for one in a higher-tax state it can understate the tax, and in a lower-tax state overstate it. Entering the property's location removes this.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Could go either wayDepreciable building-basis land split (§168 — land is not depreciable)

    When you don't specify a land value, we assume land is 25% of the price (so 75% is depreciable building) — a national-typical split. In high-land markets this over-depreciates; in low-land markets it under-depreciates. Giving a land value removes this.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Could go either wayRental Schedule-E ad-valorem property tax defaulted to a representative national-average effective rate when operating_expenses.property_tax is unset

    When you don't enter a rental's property tax, we model it at about 1.1% of the purchase price — a national-average rate — instead of leaving it at zero. Real property-tax rates vary widely by location (roughly 0.3% to over 2%), so for a high-tax area this can understate the expense and for a low-tax area overstate it. Entering the actual property tax removes this.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Could go either wayFlat rental-disposition selling-cost fraction vs itemized costs

    The cost of selling a rental is modeled as a flat percentage of the price, which can be above or below your actual commission and closing costs.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Could go either wayRental gross-rent vacancy / credit-loss allowance defaulted to the ~7% U.S. Census national rental vacancy rate

    When you don't specify a vacancy rate, we assume about 7% of gross rent is lost to vacancy and credit loss — the national-typical rate from the U.S. Census rental vacancy survey. A property with lower true vacancy is slightly understated; one with higher true vacancy is slightly overstated. Entering your own vacancy rate removes this.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Could go either wayIRC §401(a)(9)(C)(v) applicable-age rule (SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 §107)

    A fallback required-minimum-distribution start age (73) is used only when a birth year is missing. It can run two years early, pushing distributions sooner but also closing the Roth-conversion window sooner, opposite effects. In real plans a birth year is always present, so this fallback doesn't run.

    Direction checked against an outside referenceInherent modeling limit
  • Could go either wayIRC §408A(d)(4)(B) contribution/conversion/earnings ordering applied to a MODELLED opening basis

    When you don't tell us how much of your Roth is contributions versus growth, we estimate that split from your age and the annual contribution limits. The pre-59.5 income tax and 10% penalty on an early earnings withdrawal are modeled from the estimate, so the tax can be a little high or low if your real history differs. Give us your Roth contribution basis to remove this opening-split estimate.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Could go either wayIRC §415(b) / §404(o) / §404(a)(8) defined-benefit & cash-balance actuarial funding

    A self-employed defined-benefit or cash-balance plan's deductible contribution is sized with an assumed 5% growth rate and a standard mortality table, standing in for the rates and tables your plan's actuary would use — so it can run either way versus your actual plan. The funded benefit is correctly capped at your earned income, not the headline dollar maximum.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Could go either way42 U.S.C. §403(f) SSA retirement earnings test — §203(f)(8)(B)/(D) FRA-attainment-year higher exempt + $1-per-$3, §203(f)(1)+(h) months-before-FRA rule

    With your birth month we apply the Social Security earnings test month by month in the year you reach full retirement age — the higher exemption covers only the months before that birthday, none after. Without one we fall back to a whole-year estimate that can over- or under-state the benefits you keep depending on your earnings and how long you live. Add your birth month to model it exactly.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Could go either waySSA PIA bend-point formula on a single-point AIME proxy

    When we estimate your Social Security benefit, we approximate a 35-year earnings history with your current income, then apply the SSA formula. This overstates the benefit for someone at a late-career peak and understates it for someone now below their peak. It applies only when the benefit was estimated, not when you entered your own figure.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Could go either wayIRC §1211(b)/§1212(b) capital-loss ordinary offset + carryforward (state conformity). NARROWED by leg-2 (2026-09-18): the DRAWDOWN lane now MODELS both — the §1211(b) $3k offset (conformity-gated state-base reduction) + the §1212(b) own-base gain-netting (non-conformers ride the gross gain),

    A state capital loss is given no state benefit, with no $3,000 ordinary offset and no carryforward, while most states follow the federal treatment, so state tax can be slightly overstated.

    Not independently checkedOn our roadmap to refine
  • Could go either wayPer-state graduated brackets vs a single top-marginal rate

    For states without a modeled bracket table, we apply the top marginal rate to the whole state base rather than graduated brackets. That overstates tax for a graduated state at typical incomes, but understates it where local (city or county) income taxes apply. New York is no longer in this group -- its graduated brackets and high-earner benefit recapture are now modeled.

    Not independently checkedOn our roadmap to refine
  • Could go either wayIRC §2(a) qualifying surviving spouse (§1(a) rates + §63(c)(2)(A) standard deduction, 2-year window) + §6013(a)(3) year-of-death joint return

    For the two years after a spouse's death, a survivor keeping a home for a child under 19 now gets married-level brackets and standard deduction in retirement instead of single filing. Edges: not applied to working-year gains, a 19-23 student child, or married-filing-separately (may overstate tax); a young non-child dependent could wrongly trigger it (may understate tax).

    Not independently checkedOn our roadmap to refine
  • Could go either wayIRC §1014(b) (a bypass corpus is OUTSIDE the survivor's gross estate ⇒ NO §1014 step-up ⇒ the heirs take §1015 carryover basis) + §1(h) (the heir's preferential 0/15/20% LTCG rate on the built-in gain) + §1411 (heir NIIT, OMITTED)

    A credit-shelter (bypass) trust funded at the first spouse's death passes to your heirs outside the surviving spouse's estate; we now add it back into your projected inheritance. Because it gets no fresh cost-basis step-up, we estimate your heirs' capital-gains tax on its built-in gain at a single long-term rate from the household's bracket, so the inheritance shown can run slightly high or low.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Could go either wayIRC §641 (a trust is a separate taxpayer) + the RESIDENCY state's fiduciary income tax (e.g. NY Tax Law §601/§605, Form IT-205; CA R&TC §17041(e)/§17742, Form 541; 30 Del. C. §1636 for the DE non-resident-beneficiary exemption) + the STATE accumulation-distribution throwback keyed on the BENEFICIARY (trust_beneficiary_state; CA R&TC §17745(b)/(d), NY Tax Law §612(b)(40))

    We compute the state tax a lifetime-funded trust owes on what it keeps, based on the state it's a resident of — which you tell us, and which defaults to where it's sited (nothing for a no-trust-tax state like Nevada or Delaware). Which state counts as its residence can be a judgment call, and some state-specific trust rules aren't modeled yet, so the figure can run high or low.

    Not independently checkedOn our roadmap to refine

Leans cautious23

  • Leans cautiousAla. Code §40-18-19 (the AL-AGI-tiered dependent exemption $1,000/$500/$300 per dependent, NOT modeled — no dependent count at the tax seams); 1040 line 22 excess-APTC repayment (§36B(f), NOT modeled); Ala. Admin. Code Form 41 Line 11 (the FIDUCIARY federal-tax deduction, DEFERRED); all OVER-state AL tax

    In Alabama we leave out a few smaller items that would lower your state tax -- the per-dependent exemption, a repayment of excess health-insurance subsidy, the federal-tax deduction on a trust's own return, and, in a year you move into or out of Alabama, the federal-tax deduction on the Alabama part-year portion. Each omission can only over-state Alabama tax, so it is on the conservative side.

    Not independently checkedOn our roadmap to refine
  • Leans cautiousArk. Code §26-51-501 — a $29 personal tax credit per taxpayer, spouse and dependent (plus additional $29 credits for age 65+, blind or deaf), a NON-refundable reduction of the computed AR income tax (AR1000F line 34); NOT modeled by

    In Arkansas, we apply the state's tax schedule without subtracting its $29-per-person personal tax credit, so a modeled Arkansas household's state tax is slightly overstated -- about $29 per household member each year. This is deliberately conservative: leaving out a credit can only over-state tax, never understate it.

    Not independently checkedOn our roadmap to refine
  • Leans cautiousIRC §1(h)/§1(h)(7) capital-gain rate zones on a business exit's residual-LTCG + §1202 (28%-max) legs, whose rate-zone floor omits a concurrent §469-allowed rental operating LOSS

    When you sell a business in a year you also own a rental, we model how the two interact in both directions. The one small exception: if that rental runs an operating LOSS in the sale year and you're a real-estate professional, we don't let the loss lower the tax rate on the sale's capital gain, so the sale can be taxed a touch too high (never too low).

    Not independently checkedOn our roadmap to refine
  • Leans cautiousIRC §2055 (unlimited estate charitable deduction) + §691(a) (IRD is income to whoever receives it — a §501(c)(3) charity is income-tax-EXEMPT on inherited IRD, so a tax-optimal plan funds the bequest from the traditional/HSA slice first)

    A charitable gift left at death lowers your estate tax and passes to charity instead of your heirs, so we reduce both. We assume it's funded evenly from all your accounts rather than first from pre-tax retirement accounts — which a charity, unlike your heirs, owes no income tax on — so the inheritance shown for your heirs is estimated on the low, conservative side.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Leans cautiousIRC §25A (AOTC/LLC) education credit in the ACCUMULATION (working) phase, now MODELED ( E-3,

    The education tax credit is now applied in your working years too, to the cent. Two small choices stay cautious (safe-direction): the credit's cash is added to your savings just after that year's growth rather than compounding within it, and the credit that can offset tax is measured a touch conservatively. Both only ever understate your wealth, never flatter it.

    Not independently checkedOn our roadmap to refine
  • Leans cautiousIRC §25A (AOTC/LLC) + §25A(g)(2)/§529(c)(3)(B)(v) no-double-benefit coordination + §26(a) non-refundable-credit limitation

    The education tax credit is computed exactly to the law, and we claim it only when it actually helps you — never paying the matching tax for a credit your income has phased out. A couple of choices stay cautious (safe-direction): by default we apply it to the largest eligible tuition and offset it only against ordinary income tax. Entering your out-of-pocket expense removes the first.

    Not independently checkedOn our roadmap to refine
  • Leans cautiousIRC §461(l) (non-corporate excess-business-loss limitation) + §172 (net operating loss carryforward, 80%-of-taxable-income release post-2022); the cap now lives in BOTH producers

    A business loss is allowed to offset your wage and other income with no annual limit. The law caps how much business loss can offset non-business income in a year and carries the excess forward against later income, so in a large-loss year your tax can be understated. Building that cap and the carryforward is a planned next step.

    Not independently checkedOn our roadmap to refine
  • Leans cautiousIRC §691(a) (income in respect of a decedent, taxed to the recipient) + SECURE Act §401(a)(9)(H) 10-year rule

    When you name your estate's beneficiaries, each heir's share of your inherited pre-tax retirement balances (traditional 401(k)/IRA and HSA) is taxed at that heir's own income-tax rate. We tax the full amount as if received in one year rather than spread over the ten years the law allows, which can reach higher brackets — so the tax is estimated on the high (conservative, safe) side.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Leans cautiousIRC §56(b)(1)(E) (no standard deduction for AMT) / §56(b)(1)(A)(ii) (SALT disallowed, housing-interest/charity/medical allowed)

    In the stock-option alternative-minimum-tax calculation, your retirement-years AMT now keeps the itemized deductions AMT allows (home-mortgage interest, charity, and medical) and adds back only state and local taxes. Your working years still add back the whole standard deduction — exact for a standard-deduction filer, but it can overstate AMT income for someone who would itemize then.

    Direction checked against an outside referenceOn our roadmap to refine
  • Leans cautiousIRC §62(a)(1) (self-employment income nets in AGI) / §461(l) / §172(a)(2)(B) (the §461(l)-disallowed excess is a later-year NOL) / §469 (passive rental loss suspension for high earners) / §1211(b) (business-exit capital-loss limit)

    Maryland's 2% capital-gains surtax applies once your federal income clears $350,000. We let a self-employment loss reduce that income (capped by the federal excess-business-loss limit), and carry the disallowed part forward so it also lowers a later profitable year, not over-applying the surtax when it brings you back under. Any remaining effect only overstates your tax, never understates it.

    Not independently checkedOn our roadmap to refine
  • Leans cautiousMd. Code Tax-Gen §10-106 (mandatory county/local income tax, ~2.25%-3.20% by county)

    For a Maryland resident we model the mandatory county income tax at a representative 3.20% — the highest rate the law allows. Real county rates run about 2.25% to 3.20%, so for a lower-rate county we slightly overstate the tax (never understate it) until you enter your own county's rate.

    Not independently checkedOn our roadmap to refine
  • Leans cautiousIRC §1202(a)(4)/(a)(5) applicable-percentage holding-period tiers

    For qualified small-business stock, when you don't give us the sale date we round the holding period down to whole years, which can understate the exclusion tier you qualify for and so overstate the tax, a cautious direction. Give us the sale date to compute your exclusion tier to the day.

    Direction checked against an outside referenceInherent modeling limit
  • Leans cautiousCA FTB Sch. CA (540NR) / NY IT-203 part-year ratio method (full-year-resident tax prorated by residency share)

    When you move to a new state without giving the month, the move year is taxed at whichever state's tax is higher — the safe side, so it may run high; giving the month switches it to an exact split. Washington's excise, Maryland's surtax, a state deduction for federal estate tax on an inherited IRA, and a state 529 tax break all work this way — the move year gets the smaller break.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Leans cautiousIRC §168(b)(3) straight-line + §168(d)(2)/(d)(4)(B) mid-month convention (residential 27.5-yr / commercial 39-yr real property)

    Rental depreciation now takes a half-year in the purchase year (the unbiased average of the tax rules' part-year convention, since the plan carries no purchase month), fixing the former buy-year over-depreciation. A remaining sale-year timing gap under-depreciates in the year of sale, which can slightly over-state taxes (never under-state wealth).

    Not independently checkedOn our roadmap to refine
  • Leans cautiousTreas. Reg. §1.469-4 (grouping activities into an appropriate economic unit) + Treas. Reg. §1.469-5T(a)(1) (the >500-hour material-participation test aggregates a group's hours)

    IRS rules let you group properties into one activity so their hours count together toward the material-participation tests; we don't model that grouping, so each property is tested on its own hours. If grouping would have let you clear the bar, we may treat a property as passive — keeping its income in the 3.8% investment tax and deferring its loss. This runs cautious, never in your favor.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Leans cautiousTreas. Reg. §1.469-5T(a)(1)-(7) — the seven material-participation tests

    When you enter the hours you work on a rental, we apply the IRS 500-hour material-participation test. The other six ways to qualify (comparisons with others' hours, prior years of involvement, and a facts-and-circumstances judgment) aren't modeled, so a rental you're active in another way may be treated as passive, keeping its income in the 3.8% investment tax and lowering its business deduction.

    Not independently checkedOn our roadmap to refine
  • Leans cautiousIRC §691(c) / Treas. Reg. §1.691(c)-1 income-tax deduction for the federal §2001 estate tax attributable to inherited IRD

    When you inherit a pre-tax retirement account from an estate that owes federal estate tax, we deduct that estate tax against your federal income tax on the account, and against your STATE income tax when your state allows the deduction (most itemizing states do). A few states that allow it only through a credit or a dollar cap are treated conservatively (no state reduction).

    Not independently checkedOn our roadmap to refine
  • Leans cautiousNever-rosy residual of the state INHERITANCE tax for PA/NJ/KY/NE + MD's inheritance layer

    State death taxes are now modeled for every state that levies one, including the heir-relationship inheritance tax in PA, NJ, KY, NE and Maryland's inheritance layer. A couple of narrow edges are handled in the safe direction only (a young child's exemption, a child's spouse), so for those heirs the inheritance tax can be slightly over-stated, never understated.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Leans cautiousIRC §1(h) preference is federal-only; a state folds the gain into its graduated schedule

    In the bracket-modeled states, a capital gain is taxed at the state's top marginal rate rather than folded into the graduated brackets, which tends to overstate the state tax on the gain.

    Not independently checkedOn our roadmap to refine
  • Leans cautiousNew York retirement-income exclusion — pension income with no elicited source is taxed in full — NY Tax Law §612(c)(3) (govt-pension) / §612(c)(3-a) ($20k private)

    We model Michigan's capped retirement deduction and Georgia's and Colorado's per-person, age-based exclusions exactly — now including a genuine two-pension couple, where each spouse's own pension counts against their own cap. New York isn't yet modeled (its government-pension exemption needs a pension-source detail we don't collect), so it's taxed in full — conservative.

    Not independently checkedOn our roadmap to refine
  • Leans cautiousIncome-phased state SS taxation (CT/MN/NM/RI/UT/VT + CO's 55-64 band) modeled with conservative simplifications

    We model how Connecticut, Minnesota, New Mexico, Rhode Island, Utah and Vermont — and Colorado at 55-64 — exempt Social Security below an income threshold, now including Minnesota's better-of-two methods and Utah's real credit phase-out. Two conservative simplifications remain: an age test read from the primary spouse (Rhode Island, Colorado) and some unconfirmed MFS thresholds.

    Not independently checkedOn our roadmap to refine
  • Leans cautiousRCW 82.87.070 (WA qualified family-owned small-business deduction)

    Washington allows a deduction when a qualified family-owned small business is sold (RCW 82.87.070). The engine taxes the full business-exit gain without that deduction, so a household selling a qualifying family business can be OVER-taxed by the Washington excise (a conservative, safe-direction error).

    Not independently checkedOn our roadmap to refine
  • Leans cautiousRCW 82.87.020 / §1222(7) (WA excise base = federal net LONG-TERM capital gain)

    Washington's capital-gains excise applies to long-term gains only. Because the accumulation turnover legs carry no holding-period, all such gains are treated as long-term and taxed, so a household with short-term turnover gains can be slightly OVER-taxed by the Washington excise (a conservative, safe-direction error).

    Not independently checkedOn our roadmap to refine

Exact to the law7

  • Exact to the lawIRC §530 Coverdell ESA (contribution cap §530(b)(1)(A)(iii), contributor-MAGI phase-out §530(c), age-18 cutoff §530(b)(1)(A)(ii), §530(d)(4) 10% levy)

    Your Coverdell ESA's funding is modeled to the §530 rules — the $2,000 contribution limit, the income phase-out, the age-18 contribution cutoff, and tax-free growth — but because a Coverdell never appears on a federal tax return, it isn't cross-checked against an outside calculator. (The rule that an unused balance be paid out by age 30 is not yet modeled; see that disclosure.)

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Exact to the lawIRC §164(b)(7) SALT applicable-limitation cap + §163(h)(3)(F) $750k/$375k mortgage acquisition-debt cap (OBBBA 2026)

    We compute the 2026 SALT and mortgage-interest caps exactly to the new law and adjust them for inflation; this is not an approximation. Because the law is too recent for our external tax reference to cover, we pin the values to the published statute rather than validating them against an outside source.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Exact to the lawIRC §1202 QSBS gain exclusion — per-state STATE conformity resolver

    On a small-business-stock sale we now determine, by state and by the year of sale, whether your state taxes the federally-excluded gain — a handful decouple (California, Pennsylvania and others; Hawaii taxes half), most do not — and model it exactly to each state law. Because our tax reference is federal-only, this state result is pinned to the published statutes rather than validated.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Exact to the lawIRC §469(c)(7)(B) — the >750-hour + >50%-of-personal-services real-estate-professional test

    We decide real-estate-professional status by adding your hours across all your rental properties and applying the IRS tests — over 750 hours in real estate and more than half your total work time. Because the calculators we check against treat each property's active-or-passive status as an input rather than deriving it from hours, this is disclosed rather than independently verified.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Exact to the lawCA FTB Sch. CA (540NR) / NY IT-203 part-year ratio method

    Give the month and the move year splits exactly like a part-year resident's return — each state's tax prorated by the share of the year you lived there, so it's not an approximation. A state deduction for federal estate tax on an inherited IRA and a state 529 tax break split the same way. A two-state return isn't covered by our federal-only reference and assumes even income, so it's disclosed.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Exact to the lawOBBBA §70103 enhanced senior deduction (P.L. 119-21, TY2025-2028)

    We compute the new senior deduction exactly to the 2025 law ($6,000 per eligible person, phased down above $75k/$150k of income, inflation-adjusted); this is not an approximation. Because the law is too recent for our external tax reference to cover, we pin it to the published IRS guidance rather than validating it against an outside source.

    Not independently checkedInherent modeling limit
  • Exact to the lawRCW 82.87 standard deduction (indexed annually; TY2025 $278,000, TY2026 unpublished as of 2026-09-01)

    Washington's capital-gains excise standard deduction is inflation-indexed; we apply the most recent published figure ($278,000 for 2025) as a real-dollar constant, which is the standard treatment for an indexed threshold. The 2026 figure was unpublished as of September 2026, so the exact new number can't be verified yet, and state tax isn't checked against our federal-only reference.

    Not independently checkedOn our roadmap to refine

Projection, not a guarantee. Educational illustration, not financial advice. Delta Prime AI is not a registered investment adviser.

Join the beta